|
Owners Can Retain Control in Design-Build
Projects
by Peter A. Cannito and Michael L. Sickenius
The notion that the design-build method leaves owners
out of the loop on projects is invalid. While it offers
somewhat less control, the potential benefits can make the
method the right choice for owners.
An article in the September issue of New York Construction
regarding design-build programs included statements from one
person who said: "The owner relinquishes control. There's
no advocate for the owner. No one is watching out for the
owners' concerns."
That hasn't been the experience of the Metropolitan Transportation
Authority's Metro-North Railroad and doesn't have to be for
other owners either. Metro-North has experienced great success
with its design-build programs. Although an owner's control
may be reduced with design-build programs, the reduction is
not significant considering the benefits.
Metro-North still has mandated criteria, including guidelines,
standards, budgets, and schedules that are all closely monitored
for contract compliance - proof that an owner can put numerous
checks and balances in place to ensure that design-build projects
are completed to high standards.
An owner's control over a design-build project actually takes
shape when it establishes the bid selection criteria. The
owner can set up a weighted-criteria evaluation based on a
combination of low-cost and high technical-skills ratings.
The public owner in particular ends up with more control using
this method than in design-bid-build procurement, where the
lowest responsible bidder is awarded the job.
The owner also manages and controls the development of the
contract specifications and identifies critical elements that
are project-specific. If warranted, the owner can even bring
certain elements to 100 percent design prior to handing off
the documents to a design-builder, such as railroad safety
requirements, government executive orders, electrical systems,
fire codes, and track and building standards.
During the design phase, the owner also has the opportunity
to accept or reject nonstandard plans presented by the design-builder.
The owner also reviews the design-builder's drawings for conformance
to the contract requirements prior to construction.
Once construction begins, the owner or its representative
still can perform inspections to be sure all work conforms
to the intent of contract documents, is taking place in a
safe manner, and meets quality standards. In addition, the
owner reviews monthly payment requisitions submitted by contractors,
and prior to making any payment, it can inspect the project
to ensure that completed work is free of defects and fits
the intended purpose.
The design-builder furthermore has numerous obligations to
an owner throughout the project under the Design-Build Institute's
general condition of contract form, such as:
- owner review and approval of interim design submissions
in a timely fashion to ensure contract compliance, including
design criteria, drawings, diagrams, and other specifications
- corrective action by the design-builder within seven days
of written notice from the owner that work does not conform
to the contract
- owner oversight of safety requirements
- owner role in obtaining permits and licenses
- owner approval of delay justification
- owner approval before the start of any extra work that
changes contract price or schedule
- owner notification if a design-builder determines any
contract work is no longer required.
The American Council of Engineering Companies recommends
that an owner and design-builder maintain effective communication
and interaction. That approach is part of Metro North's philosophy,
which guarantees our interests are addressed throughout a
project.
Metro North also recognizes that relinquishing control in
some areas is necessary to support the design-build methodology.
An example of where the agency does relinquish control is
by having a single source of responsibility for both design
and construction.
In conventional delivery methods, the owner spends endless
hours aligning the designer and contractor to share a common
goal in order to successfully complete the project - a costly
process. Under design-build, the owner does not have to act
as a referee between the contractor and designer, because
those two players formed the team that came together and have
a vested interest in being partners.
Everyone involved in a project must be held accountable.
Giving all parties "control" of their responsibilities,
including the owner, ensures such accountability. That framework
is what makes design-build a successful tool.
Peter Cannito, left, is president
and Michael Sickenius is director of shops, yards, and environment
for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Metro-North
Railroad.
|