|
Restoration Challenges
Contractors and Designers Face
Tall Order to Preserve Historic Details
by Jim Parsons
Restoration
and renovation projects in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut
are increasingly intricate affairs.
Despite many differences in the types and scopes of projects,
many design and construction teams handling the restoration
and renovation of aging buildings in the region face strict
landmarks preservation rules as they try to counter the ravages
of time, the elements, and neglect.
The margins for error have become even slimmer with the need
to integrate modern infrastructure into an existing structure's
physical constraints, maintain a building's historic integrity,
and endure greater public scrutiny from preservationists and
neighbors.
Some of the most visible projects involve extensive preservation
of exterior features, the focus of most landmarks rules. A
current example of the painstaking focus on restoring historic
details can be found in Lower Manhattan where Seaboard Weatherproofing
and Restoration of Port Chester, N.Y., is rehabilitating the
limestone and terra-cotta façade of the Woolworth Building,
the 94-year-old skyscraper designed by Cass Gilbert.
An analysis of the 60-story landmark building's envelope tallied
approximately 2,000 cracked and delaminated stones up to 3
sq. ft. in size, as well as unsealed joints on the copper
mansard roofs, said Jeff Smith, project manager for Seaboard.
"We're recreating hundreds of different types of terra-cotta
stone, some of which are badly deteriorated," he added.
"In some cases, we can use a similar piece to make a
mold. In others, we have to get a little artistic, while also
staying historically accurate."
The $5.25 million, 18-month project also calls for a high
degree of logistical detail, Smith said.
"We have to catalog and track the location of every stone
and coordinate the status of replacement pieces with the stone
fabricator," he said. "That also means coordinating
with the architect to ensure that the replacement piece matches
the appearance of the original when we pin it to the façade."
Logistics have likewise added layers of complexity to a project
in Midtown - the restoration of the east façade of
the James A. Farley Post Office Building, which is in the
early stages of an $818 million conversion into a major new
intermodal transportation hub that will be known as Daniel
Patrick Moynihan Station.
The post office's Eighth Avenue entrances remain open, so
Pittsburgh-based Graciano Corp., the exterior renovation contractor,
has erected 50,000 sq. ft. of scaffolding to protect postal
customers using five doorways while workers clean, repoint,
and repair the granite façade; rehabilitate 21 distinctive
Corinthian columns; and replace 33 window units.
"Overall, the exterior is in good shape, but a lot of
areas needed some extra care," said Dino Rossi, Graciano's
vice president of operations. "Many of the pine window
frames had deteriorated, but we were able to reuse most of
the components and adapt them for new insulated glass and
weather stripping."
Reconstruction of an ornamental, 300-lin-ft. terra-cotta cheneau
that once punctuated the roofline of the building's main entrances
has required special attention, even though Graciano replaced
other deteriorating portions of the original cheneau with
brick in 1992.
"It will take a lot of technical effort to create hundreds
of pieces of terra cotta to recreate the cheneau and match
the architectural detail on other parts of the building,"
Rossi added.
|
Prepping Old Structures for New Use
The complexities of restoration and renovation projects aren't
just on the
exterior. Retrofitting structural features of buildings to
handle new uses is often a highly technical process.
In Stamford, Conn., for example, NPK Building of Greenwich,
Conn., is transforming 72,000 sq. ft. of manufacturing and
office space into a modern mixed-use development called Atlantic
Center @ Stamford Station, a portion of which will become
the new U.S. headquarters of Virgin Atlantic Airways. The
$10 million project is slated for completion next summer.
The complex's original three-story wooden post-and-beam building,
built by the Blickensderfer Typewriter Co. in 1892, was augmented
with steel and masonry additions over the years as the property
changed hands.
"The big challenge is to aesthetically blend new M-E-P,
fire protection, life safety, and communications systems with
the original interior," said Nicholas Kyriakos, president
of NPK. "We also want to integrate modern amenities such
as a three-story atrium and lobbies so that you have the efficiency
of a modern building without losing the character and spirit
of the original architecture."
Unlike many cases where historic features can be an obstacle,
Atlantic Center's industrial heritage is an advantage.
"Because the building was designed to support a lot
of heavy machinery, the timbers in the column, truss, and
floor systems are structurally sound," Kyriakos added.
"The generous ceiling heights also give us a little more
leeway to integrate building systems without having to conceal
historic features."
Converting the former Gallery of Modern Art at 2 Columbus
Circle in Manhattan into the new Museum of Arts and Design
also entails a structural reconfiguration. While the building's
fundamental use will remain the same, the makeover is even
more substantial than with Atlantic Center.
The slender, 12-story, 54,000-sq.-ft. structure built in
1964 had an eclectic strategy of stairwells that complemented
the museum's avant-garde art collection, but wasn't appropriate
for modern emergency egress needs, said Mark Pankoff, project
executive for New York-based F.J. Sciame Construction, which
is construction manager on the $65 million project.
"Floor-to-floor stairs were all over the building,"
he added. "Relocating them adjacent to the elevator core
requires new structural steel on every floor."
The new exterior façade features 3- by 15-ft. terra
cotta panels on a unibody curtain wall and 2-ft.-wide, floor-to-ceiling
windows. The museum's decision to replace the façade
drew criticism from opponents ranging from the National Trust
for Historic Preservation to ad hoc neighborhood groups, many
of which contend that the original, largely windowless marble-clad
façade was significant to New York City's architectural
history.
The project has nonetheless moved forward, and Pankoff said
the owner may well have had little choice in its decision.
"The spalling of the stone façade was already
severe enough to require a sidewalk bridge to protect pedestrians,"
he added. "Even if the museum had decided to retain the
appearance, we would have had to strip off the entire original
façade."
Discussions and Detective Work
Renovation and restoration efforts tend to elicit strong
community reactions, often because of the historical significance
of the structures, and project teams often have to handle
the fallout carefully.
The renovation of the famed boardwalk Convention Hall, Paramount
Theater, Carousel, and Power Plant buildings in Asbury Park,
N.J. - part of a 56-acre redevelopment of the area called
Oceanfront Asbury - illustrates how differences of opinion
can arise in projects that otherwise enjoy wide support. The
effort would cost $50 million to $60 million.
While local officials and the public have welcomed the renewal
of the decaying 1920s-era structures into the new 250,000-sq.-ft.
mixed-use development, the devil is in the details, said Larry
Fishman, COO of Asbury Partners of Asbury Park, the project's
developer.
"A project of this scale and complexity requires a partnership
with state and local agencies, historic preservation experts,
and the community as a whole," he added.
Agencies that must sign off on renovation details have differing
priorities, particularly in buildings like the Convention
Hall and Theater, neighboring buildings that are both still
in use. For example, fire officials sought immediate upgrades
to 80-year-old fire doors that may not be strong enough to
support panic bars and other hardware, but the project team
still needed approval from state historic preservation officials
for the potential replacement doors - a process that delayed
the start of other renovations.
"It's a little bit of a tug of war," Fishman said.
"You need to have everybody working together."
Perhaps the most perplexing part of restoration and renovation
projects is the challenge of unforeseen structural problems
and incomplete or nonexistent documentation about a building's
conditions.
Such issues are present in the multiphased restoration of
Harlem's 92-year-old Apollo Theater. Chicago-based Jones Lang
LaSalle is program manager on the $65 million effort, which
began in 2002 and involves renovation of the stage, seating,
and exterior features as well as major infrastructure upgrades
and improvements to meet federal Americans with Disabilities
Act guidelines, said Randy Apfelbaum, senior project manager
for Jones Lang.
While performing an exterior condition assessment of the
theater in 2001, inspectors from Leslie E. Robertson Associates
of New York, the structural engineer, discovered that many
tieback rods supporting the famous marquee were loose, said
Richard Zottola, principal-in-charge for the firm.
"We immediately installed scaffolding to shore up the
marquee from below," he added. "It remained there
until the new high-tech marquee was ready for installation
last December as part of the refurbished terra-cotta façade."
After the façade work wrapped up last winter, project
crews began to replace seating in the theater during the spring.
This summer they will be renovating the stage area. Other
major restoration tasks in the theater, offices, and other
spaces of the building will begin in 2008 and finish in 2010.
Zottola predicted that more surprises await as work on the
other renovation tasks at the Apollo continue - even as the
theater remains open for performances.
"There is no structural documentation for the building,"
Zottola said. "We'll need to do a lot of probing to locate
the key structural elements, assess their condition, and determine
what will have to be modified."
|