|
LEED Competitor
New Rating System Targets Commercial
Construction
by Diane Greer
A new competitor - or supplement - to
the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design standard is trying to break into the
commercial construction market.
The Green Globes system, adopted by the Green Building Initiative
of Portland, Ore., came online domestically last year, and
some in the building industry are gauging its potential as
either an alternative to LEED or as a tool to use alongside
the popular certification program.
The Web-based Green Globes system is designed as an interactive
tool with eight questionnaires covering project stages from
initiation to commissioning. Within each stage, the system
groups questions into seven environmental performance categories,
while also supplying reports that offer suggestions to users
for enhancing the sustainability of a project.
"The interactive reports become a learning tool linking
to documentation and research, especially where you are deficient,"
said Harvey Bryan, a professor in the Arizona State University
College of Design and board member of the Green Building Initiative,
which was formed in 2004 by the National Association of Homebuilders.
The organization licensed Green Globes in the United States
last year, tapping into the program that has roots in the
Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method,
a sustainable design evaluation tool first developed in the
United Kingdom and later brought to Canada, where it was eventually
shaped into the Green Globes format.
It remains unclear whether the market views Green Globes
as a rival to LEED or as a supplementary tool. Sam Missimer,
director of sustainable design at Venezia and Associates,
an architectural firm based in New Brunswick, N.J., said he
views the two systems as complements.
"It is an adjunct to LEED," said Missimer, who
has proposed using Green Globes to a client on one of his
projects. "The two are not mutually exclusive. There
are cost factors and attributes of the two programs that are
quantitatively different. I think the two can coexist."
But Ward Hubble, executive director of the Green Building
Initiative, is eager to point out how the systems are different.
"There is a lot of room in the marketplace and a need
for workable solutions for mainstream builders," Ward
added.
That focus on "mainstream builders" comes in response
to the U.S. Green Building Council's strategy to position
LEED to serve the higher end of the building market on the
belief that the top will blaze a trail for the rest of the
industry.
"LEED is focused on the top 25 percent of the market,"
said Michelle Moore, USGBC's vice president of community and
communications. "LEED is a tool for market transformation.
It sets the bar for the industry."
In contrast, Bryan said Green Globes targets the remaining
75 percent.
"That end of the market really needs to be brought up
to speed on the reasons to build green and the tools,"
he added.
Another sign that the initiative views LEED as a competitor
is its efforts to lobby government bodies against choosing
a single green building standard, and it recently succeeded
in getting the federal government to adopt a policy that states
18 federal agencies will be "rating system-neutral."
More than a dozen municipalities and states, including New
York, already have adopted LEED as a specific benchmark for
green building standards.
Hubble also said Green Globes stands apart from LEED because
it doesn't require project teams to produce specialized documentation,
but instead relies primarily on standard construction documents
and onsite verification. Hubble said this avoids the cost
of producing and tracking extra certification forms.
Another differentiating trait is that Green Globes incorporates
credits for "life cycle analysis," a methodology
of assessing long-range environmental "costs" of
a particular product by accounting for resource and energy
consumption and waste accumulation, among other factors, said
Wayne Trusty, a GBI board member and president of Athena Institute,
a Canada-based nonprofit organization that promotes sustainable
design.
USGBC is considering how to add life cycle analysis to LEED,
but is proceeding deliberately because of a lack of industry-recognized
evaluation standards, Moore said. She added that the effort
is not in response to Green Globes.
"We really do not know much about them," Moore
said. "Our position with regard to other green building
standards in general is that there are important questions
- who is developing the standard, where is the funding coming
from, and what is their track record?"
Whether they are competitors or not, Green Globes and LEED
have similarities and differences in format and application.
Like LEED, Green Globes allows projects to earn points, with
ratings determined by the percentage of points earned. Green
Globes is based on a 1,000-point scale, and users can gain
one to four "globes" for levels of certification
that would be roughly equivalent to the four rating categories
of LEED, Hubble said.
Also like LEED, Green Globes offers certification for projects,
with an initial access fee of $500, similar to the $450 LEED
registration fee. While LEED has a pricing scale that can
charge anywhere from $1,250 to $17,500 for certification,
the most recent Green Globes fee was $4,000.
The Green Globes third-party certification includes a conditional
verification at the construction documents stage and a final
verification, with onsite inspection.
Green Globes also is available as a voluntary, non-certification
tool, said Greg Bergmiller, LEED project manager for S/L/A/M
Collaborative, a Glastonbury, Conn., architect. He is trying
out the system on a recently completed project that his firm
designed, the 62,000-sq.-ft. Pfizer Clinical Research Unit
in New Haven, Conn., a building that is already seeking LEED
certification.
"One of the nice things about Green Globes is that when
you are done filling in the online survey, it gives you quick
turnaround on the results and nice charts to share with the
client," he added.
Bergmiller said Green Globes also offers more chances for
partial credit. He cited daylight exposure at Pfizer's building
as an example, where 89 percent of regularly occupied space
has outside views - just shy of a 90 percent LEED threshold
to get an extra point, but enough for partial Green Globes
credit.
Additional research by Tom Stabile.
|